How IM18+ compares to other age verification methods in terms of privacy, security, and user experience. See why zero-knowledge verification is the best choice for both users and businesses.
Verification Method | Data Required | Privacy Risk | User Experience | Implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|
IM18+ Zero-Knowledge
Federated verification
|
Age confirmation only
• Simple yes/no question • No personal information • No registration required |
Minimal Risk
No data to breach
|
Excellent
Verify once, access everywhere
|
Simple
Iframe + PostMessage
|
Credit Card Verification
Traditional payment method
|
Full payment details
• Card number, CVV, expiry • Billing address • Cardholder name |
High Risk
PCI compliance required
|
Fair
Per-site verification
|
Complex
Payment gateway integration
|
ID Document Upload
Government ID scanning
|
Government ID scan
• Full name and address • Date of birth • ID photo and details |
Very High Risk
Identity theft risk
|
Poor
Complex, intrusive
|
Very Complex
OCR, ML verification
|
Third-party Services
External age verification
|
Varies by provider
• Email + password • Personal information • Payment details |
Medium-High Risk
Third-party data sharing
|
Fair
Account required
|
Moderate
API integration
|
Simple Checkbox
Basic "I'm 18+" checkbox
|
No verification
• User declaration only • No identity check • Easily bypassed |
Low Risk
No data collected
|
Excellent
One click
|
Trivial
But ineffective
|
By not collecting personal data in the first place, IM18+ eliminates 90% of privacy compliance challenges. No data means no breach risk, no consent fatigue, and no regulatory headaches. It's privacy protection by mathematical proof, not just policy.
© 2025 IM18+ Age Verification System. Secure, federated, privacy-focused.